PROTECTED ACTIVITY The state and the union shall not impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by the Ralph C. Dills ACT MOU 5.03 section A
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Standardize roll-out delayed
The original date for implementation of the Standardized Staffing Model of July 9th has been changed due to negotiations with the State and CDCR. The date has been postponed till July 23rd.
This applies to CIM, our date has been delayed til July 23
Recent updates on the CDCR's DAI Standardization Staffing Model:
CCPOA submitted a Request to Extend Implementation of New Standardized Staffing Model asking for a 60-day hiatus; 30-day window for CCPOA and CDCR to negotiate the final Standardized Staffing Model at a statewide level and an additional 30 days in which local chapters receive information relevant to individual institutions, for loca...l negotiation on local matter not addressed at state level.
CCPOA has also submitted a Step 4 Grievance Regarding the State's Failure to Provide Sufficient Notice to CCPOA Concerning Proposed Implementation of Standardized Staffing Model, which site sections violated: Section 5.03 - Discrimination/Interference in CCPOA's ability to Meaningfully Represent Its Members, Section 27.01(B) - Failure to Adequately Notice/Provide a Meaningful opportunity to Bargain and Section 2701(C) - Elimination of Local Agreements. CCPOA is asking that CDCR cease and desist implementation of its Standardized Staffing Model until it can: (1)provide CCPOA with the actual documentation governing the implementation of the Standardized Staffing Model and an additional 30 days to negotiate, on a state level; and (2) provide local CCPOA chapters with pertinent documentation governing the implementation Standardized Staffing Model at their particular institution, along with 30 days thereafter to negotiate, on a local level.
(from CCPOA CSATF)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
If you get a chance ask a local Rep. if you can read the letter sent to DPA regarding this grievance.
ReplyDeleteWe can all be very critical of our Union, but this is what it's all about. Using the MOU and 27.01, the State tried to implement changes affecting our membership without our Unions imput.
The State was ready to move on 4.V on July 9, even after telling CCPOA that 5.V was also getting ready roll out. Anyone seen 5.V?
Stay tuned this should be good!
Sitnbull, the local reps at our joint don't know of this, is it possible to post a link allowing us to retrieve it? Thanks
ReplyDeleteThey don't know anything!
ReplyDeleteI heard from a reliable source that all of these job cuts were already signed off by CCPOA back in April. CCPOA already sold us down the river and its already official. They are just trying to make it look like they are fighting this now. CCPOA is just putting on a front right now. We have already been screwed and everyone will see just how bad on July 23. CCPOA is not telling it's members the truth.
ReplyDeleteNews media when writing a story about CCPOA would use the term "powerful prison guard union" you probably won't see that term used anymore. The new term will be "the once powerful prison guard union"
ReplyDeletei will say it again until all of us[co's ] get together find a common ground. OG'S and new fish together we will all ways be divided.MMMMMMMMMM, new fish worried there jobs and old fish worried about there overtime.WTF.
ReplyDelete